LLM Discussion Board
LL.M. Discussion Board > United Kingdom - Ireland > Rank the London Big 3 
Rank the London Big 3
| Author | Message |
capa ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined: 10 Oct 2005 Posts: 164 |
Rank the London Big 3
Hey everyone, Mon Jan 21, 2008 04:31 PM I have offers from all the "Big 3" and am waiting on Oxford. How would you rank the schools? I spoke with a partners from international law firms and academics, and while a couple initially said 1) LSE 2)UCL and 3) King's... i'm not so sure anymore. ANyway that was my initial post. After some extensive research, looking on these forums and thinking bout it, I tend to now disagree. I have asked more lawyers and academics and it is between UCL and LSE... UCL being preferred for various reasons. I change my mind a lot. My ranking before I applied was always 1) UCL 2) LSE and 3) King's. Back to that! :-) Might change again, but, for sure, UCL and LSE and the top schools in London. What do you all think? Thanks, and good luck with the applications! [Edited by capa on 24 Jan 2008] |
|
|
|
Banker ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined: 22 May 2007 Posts: 60 |
Rank the London Big 3
fully agree
Mon Jan 21, 2008 05:04 PM |
|
|
|
hjscotland ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined: 14 Nov 2007 Posts: 134 |
Rank the London Big 3
I agree, based on advice from academics.
Mon Jan 21, 2008 09:44 PM |
|
|
|
Villy J.D. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Joined: 14 Oct 2006 Posts: 25 |
Rank the London Big 3
I am associate attorney at Baker & McKenzie and definitely chose UCL for my LL.M... although LSE has certainly done a great job marketing itself as the top uni in London and thus it is in the "top of mind" of many employers.......
Tue Jan 22, 2008 04:02 AM [Edited by Villy J.D. on 22 Jan 2008] |
|
|
|
capa ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined: 10 Oct 2005 Posts: 164 |
Rank the London Big 3
Thanks villy, but I read your previous posts re when you applied to LSE last year and was put on the waiting list until July, you seemed quite anxious... did you apply to UCL last year as well? Were you given a place at the LSE? Tue Jan 22, 2008 04:36 AM I guess that's the hard thing about this forum, which is why I waited until I got offers from all before I made a decision. |
|
|
|
Villy J.D. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Joined: 14 Oct 2006 Posts: 25 |
Rank the London Big 3
Mmmm actually I applied to both UCL and LSE for the 2007-2008 academic year... while waiting for a response I got a job offer as associate attorney at Baker & McKenzie..... so..... I took the job and made a request for deferral at UCL which they accepted.......... LSE doesn't do that.... that is one of the other reasons why I'm going to UCL.......
Tue Jan 22, 2008 06:50 AM |
|
|
|
sherman ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Joined: 21 Jan 2008 Posts: 12 |
Rank the London Big 3
For London, it is UCL or LSE, as you wish, though I have said that I think that at UCL the big names are more likely to actually teach the course. Tue Jan 22, 2008 09:09 PM King's is very good, but not quite in the same league. |
|
|
|
capa ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined: 10 Oct 2005 Posts: 164 |
Rank the London Big 3
now i'm getting advice from other partners and academics that UCL is the place to be... and I would actually now agree based on research output etc. Wed Jan 23, 2008 11:39 PM At least it was always between UCL and LSE. Its a really hard decision. |
|
|
|
apeman ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Joined: 11 Jan 2008 Posts: 5 |
Rank the London Big 3
been to both lse and ucl and found lse teaching much higher level personally...although lse charge a lot more money, you have more personal contact with good teachers and it is better known internationally overall, not just for law (which is important since many of their law subjects incorporate other diciplines like economics or anthropology/). like some of my other friends, i initially got rejected at lse but built up my cv and finally got in.
Thu Jan 24, 2008 02:02 AM |
|
|
|
apeman ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Joined: 11 Jan 2008 Posts: 5 |
Rank the London Big 3
also one more thing! one issue which i think ucl needs to improve on is how they inform their students about who is on the course teaching. many people listed on their website either doesnt actually teach much (maybe a week or 2) or infact left ucl but remains on website!!! lse all the way!
Thu Jan 24, 2008 02:05 AM |
|
|
|
eyesight ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Joined: 23 Jan 2008 Posts: 1 |
Rank the London Big 3
hi, i agree with the above. lse is a better school and it is better known internationally. Acadamics like Professor Greenwood and Conar Gearty are amazing. went to ucl to do a Masters last year and they spent most of the lectures quoting lse academics!!!! Thu Jan 24, 2008 02:10 AM 1. LSE 2. KINGS 3. UCL |
|
|
|
troyman ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Joined: 23 Jan 2008 Posts: 1 |
Rank the London Big 3
thanks for your thoughts. LSE is a good school and they have some nice public lectures. last year i got to see Alan Greenspan, Benazir Bhutto amongst others in lectures there!! i know a over the years they have had likes of KofI Anann, Bill Clinton and Nelsen Mandella speak there too. Howeverthey can be a bit snobby. They charge more than the other universities- and also are no longer part of University of London LLM unlike the others (not sure about ucl but i know the year i did it they were part of Uof L LLM).Thu Jan 24, 2008 02:21 AM My views: 1.LSE 2. Kings 3. SOAS 4. UCL |
|
|
|
capa ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined: 10 Oct 2005 Posts: 164 |
Rank the London Big 3
wow - ok, lse then! i think that is clear - everyone says the same thing!
Thu Jan 24, 2008 02:38 AM |
|
|
|
asc ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Joined: 03 Jan 2008 Posts: 15 |
Rank the London Big 3
People will always have their own opinion on this matter.Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:39 AM There isn't much difference between UCL, LSE and KCL imo. You have Oxford and Cambridge at the top and then UCL, LSE and KCL more or less form the big three after them. When picking which Uni to go to I think one should pick based on the course they want to do. So for example there is no point in going to LSE for international law if UCL is better at it. (Now I don't know whether or not LSE/UCL even teaches international law, im just giving an example). |
|
|
|
sherman ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Joined: 21 Jan 2008 Posts: 12 |
Rank the London Big 3
There is no longer an intercollegiate llm at university of London. All colleges now run their own degrees.Thu Jan 24, 2008 01:51 PM I have been to both UCL and LSE. I really do not think there is a profound difference between them, in terms of teaching quality, research output, etc. Troyman said that the UCL lecturers quoted those from the LSE. I had the opposite experience: the LSE people quoted the people at UCL!!! Personally I found UCL better. I did find that a number of names at the LSE were unavailable on my courses, most of the time... |
|
|
|
cowboyblues ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined: 18 Dec 2005 Posts: 74 |
Rank the London Big 3
It's a bit pointless analysing the 'rankings' of these three colleges until a good few years have gone by, and more marked differences from the old intercollegiate programme emerge.Sat Jan 26, 2008 02:51 PM But... on the quality of teaching alone, I found UCL and KCL miles ahead of LSE (which was a surprise to me at the time!). But these experiences/opinions change on almost a yearly basis as faculty members move around or move on etc. In terms of law firms and recognition etc. having a LLM degree from one particular UoL college, rather than another, doesn't make any tangible difference at all, unless the employer is interested in a particular speciality that one of the colleges may excel at. Completely agree with asc's comments. [Edited by cowboyblues on 26 Jan 2008] |
|
|
|
qwe ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Joined: 25 Jan 2008 Posts: 4 |
Rank the London Big 3
people have pwn voews about this so no point in too much argument about it. however one thing is true, lse is better known internationally in my experience. when i when to america last year i struggled to meet people who knew what ucl or kcl are...they all seemed to know about lse!Sat Jan 26, 2008 06:11 PM personal opinion: 1. LSE. 2. SOAS 3. KINGS I didnt get into lse but got into SOAS and UCL. hope to re- apply next year for lse!!! |
|
|
|
CR ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Joined: 13 Jan 2008 Posts: 20 |
Rank the London Big 3
Hi,Sun Jan 27, 2008 07:07 AM I know this is a bit irrelevant, but can you can you give me an insider on SOAS entry requirements! I mean does good professional experience count? Can it replace poor grades(no honours)? Or will it be impossible to get in? Thx ! |
|
|
|
claire444 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Joined: 28 Jan 2008 Posts: 1 |
Rank the London Big 3
Hey,Tue Jan 29, 2008 11:43 AM I am in the same position as a lot of you with offers from all three. Anyone know which is the best for finance/business law? Decisions, decisions... |
|
|
|
olgun1903 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
![]() Joined: 06 Feb 2008 Posts: 27 |
Rank the London Big 3
my GPA is 3.50 out of 4.00 and i have no idea is it enough to apply for King's or LSE... could anybody enlighten me on this topic??
Thu Feb 07, 2008 03:49 PM |
|
|
|
Bender ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 Jan 2008 Posts: 113 |
Rank the London Big 3
From what I understand of the conversion between the 4-point scale and the U.K. scale, it isn't so much your raw G.P.A. score that matters but your overall class rank; if a 3.5 places you in the upper 10% of your class, then you're right in there. If for some reason a 3.5 was the average score at your law school (admittedly unlikely), then your chances are somewhat weaker, and your school was decidedly odd.Thu Feb 07, 2008 04:27 PM Someone more knowledgable than myself would have to comment on what approximate class rank the Big 3 are looking for, however. Would it be fair to say top 15%? |
|
|
|
Justin_22 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
![]() Joined: 18 Aug 2007 Posts: 8 |
Rank the London Big 3
Hi, Fri Feb 08, 2008 12:53 PM What concerns the rankings - UCL stands above LSE and way above Kings most of the time. One of the examples: www.topuniversities.com/worlduniversityrankings/re… JS |
|
|
|
Russ ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined: 08 Jan 2005 Posts: 207 |
Rank the London Big 3
According to this ranking, Imperial College should be your first choice in London (BTW: Imperial does not have a law faculty).Fri Feb 08, 2008 09:04 PM What I want to say is that I would not base my decision on general worldwide university rankings. Apart from that, the QS "ranking" you linked to does not even provide their methodology. The only respected worldwide ranking that I know is the one by the Institute of Higher Education, Shanghai Jiao Tong University: www.arwu.org/rank/2007/ARWU2007_Top100.htm |
|
|
|
sherman ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Joined: 21 Jan 2008 Posts: 12 |
Rank the London Big 3
Russ, you say that this ranking you cite is the only respected one you know. Thanks for the link, which was interesting. Sat Feb 09, 2008 06:35 PM But, in this ranking UCL is at 25 worldwide, and the LSE does not make the top 100! While I personally think UCL is well above the LSE, having been to both, the fact that Nottingham makes the top 100 list but the LSE does not, just can't be right. (?) Or maybe law is only one factor of many in their calculations, so this list is also misleading, something you criticised the others for... |
|
|
|
Russ ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined: 08 Jan 2005 Posts: 207 |
Rank the London Big 3
Sat Feb 09, 2008 11:34 PM Or maybe law is only one factor of many in their calculations, so this list is also misleading, something you criticised the others for... Exactly. That's why I said that that I would not base my decision on a general worldwide university ranking. As you will probably know there are two important rankings of UK law schools. The one by the Times and the other one by the Guardian: extras.timesonline.co.uk/gug/gooduniversityguide.p… browse.guardian.co.uk/education?SearchBySubject=&F… Both have their weaknesses. The current Times ranking has been criticized by many for placing Aberdeen ahead of Oxford. No matter how much relevance you give to these rankings, one thing they show is that there is not much difference between LSE, UCL and KCL as far as the quallty of their law faculty is concerned. If I were to choose among these three, I would first look at the professors in the area of law I want to specialize in (e.g. competition law > Prof. Richard Whish > KCL). Secondly, I would take into account the reputation of the UoL colleges in my country (US/Canada > LSE; France/Germany > KCL; UK/Ireland > UCL). |
|
|
|

















