LLM Discussion Board
LL.M. Discussion Board > USA > UCLA vs. Hastings 
UCLA vs. Hastings
| Author | Message |
ConfusedLL.M 
Joined: 31 Mar 2008 Posts: 3 |
UCLA vs. Hastings
Any thoughts on which school is preferred for LL.M. I have received acceptance to both and am on waiting for Duke and Columbia. I live in SFO close to Hastings, so the decision is very difficult. Tue Apr 01, 2008 09:56 PM Your comments are welcome. |
 Profile
 P.M.
|
 Quote
|
pedrinus  Joined: 26 Mar 2005 Posts: 95 |
UCLA vs. Hastings
Hey. I got admission Hastings as well. I heard the LLM class is very small which is excellent and the range of courses are huge!!!Wed Apr 02, 2008 12:29 AM I am tempted to accept their offer. It is a good school with a great reputation in the bay area!!! |
|
Profile
P.M.
|
Quote
|
| outlawCA Joined: 19 May 2008
Posts: 4 | UCLA vs. Hastings
As a fresh Hastings LLM alumni (class 2008) I have to warn you. The school is good one, but after all, the LLM there was more or less a nice joke, if your reason is to have a job right after graduation. Hastings is well known in the bay area, but that's it.Tue May 20, 2008 08:58 AM If you get admitted to Columbia or UCLA, do not hesitate to go for it. It will definetly enhance your chances to find a (better) job after the LLM. Good luck |
|
Profile
P.M.
|
Quote
|
Reply to this post