Hi,
I am currently struggling between these universities, any opinions on the subject?
To give a little bit more information if needed:
I want to work all around the world in law firms, companies, NGO, or even institutions, as a lawyer/sollicitor/negociator/lobbyist/project director I do not really care actually (I will be a lawyer specialised in business law and tax in about 2 months in France).
Correct me if I am wrong, to me an excellent LLM must represent 4 things that will be reknowned internationally: reputation, skills, international network, employability.
Here is the short version of my actual personal ranking:
1. Manchester
2. Warwick
3. Bristol
4. Queen Mary, University of London
5. Glasgow
6. Newcastle
And here are my thoughts in the long version for the warriors ^_^' (thank youuu):
1. Manchester
++ = Great rank, international reputation, employers like it a lot?, active and attracting city, lot of students to connect with
-- = Really good at law? Renowned for economics and business no?
2. Warwick
++ = Great rank, very good reputation inside and outside uk, lot of employers told me they hire these dudes
-- = Really good at law?
3. Bristol
++ = one of the best rank in law, very interesting new llm for 2016 including courses mixing law, sociology and politics
-- = kind of unknowned outside uk? maybe a bit snob I heard?
4. Queen Mary, University of London
++ = french law firms I could talk to said they like it a lot, wide range of very interesting courses, part of the University of London, London town
influence for career, reputation and activity
-- = maybe seen as one of the worst inside london? ('competing' against UCL, LSE, and KCL :/), 'bad' rank inside and outside uk (except 3rd in the Guardian
can someone explain me this???), especially in the world rankings
5. Glasgow
++ = reknowned school of law, good ranking inside uk, not bad worldwide
-- = kind of unknowned outside uk, especially for employers?
6. Newcastle
Well, seems to clearly be the weakest here from all points of view
Thank you so much everyone for your time and consideration, have a good holidays!
Queen Mary / Manchester / Bristol / Warwick International business law
Posted Aug 24, 2016 23:08
Hi,
I am currently struggling between these universities, any opinions on the subject?
To give a little bit more information if needed:
I want to work all around the world in law firms, companies, NGO, or even institutions, as a lawyer/sollicitor/negociator/lobbyist/project director I do not really care actually (I will be a lawyer specialised in business law and tax in about 2 months in France).
Correct me if I am wrong, to me an excellent LLM must represent 4 things that will be reknowned internationally: reputation, skills, international network, employability.
Here is the short version of my actual personal ranking:
1. Manchester
2. Warwick
3. Bristol
4. Queen Mary, University of London
5. Glasgow
6. Newcastle
And here are my thoughts in the long version for the warriors ^_^' (thank youuu):
1. Manchester
++ = Great rank, international reputation, employers like it a lot?, active and attracting city, lot of students to connect with
-- = Really good at law? Renowned for economics and business no?
2. Warwick
++ = Great rank, very good reputation inside and outside uk, lot of employers told me they hire these dudes
-- = Really good at law?
3. Bristol
++ = one of the best rank in law, very interesting new llm for 2016 including courses mixing law, sociology and politics
-- = kind of unknowned outside uk? maybe a bit snob I heard?
4. Queen Mary, University of London
++ = french law firms I could talk to said they like it a lot, wide range of very interesting courses, part of the University of London, London town
influence for career, reputation and activity
-- = maybe seen as one of the worst inside london? ('competing' against UCL, LSE, and KCL :/), 'bad' rank inside and outside uk (except 3rd in the Guardian
can someone explain me this???), especially in the world rankings
5. Glasgow
++ = reknowned school of law, good ranking inside uk, not bad worldwide
-- = kind of unknowned outside uk, especially for employers?
6. Newcastle
Well, seems to clearly be the weakest here from all points of view
Thank you so much everyone for your time and consideration, have a good holidays!
I am currently struggling between these universities, any opinions on the subject?
To give a little bit more information if needed:
I want to work all around the world in law firms, companies, NGO, or even institutions, as a lawyer/sollicitor/negociator/lobbyist/project director I do not really care actually (I will be a lawyer specialised in business law and tax in about 2 months in France).
Correct me if I am wrong, to me an excellent LLM must represent 4 things that will be reknowned internationally: reputation, skills, international network, employability.
Here is the short version of my actual personal ranking:
1. Manchester
2. Warwick
3. Bristol
4. Queen Mary, University of London
5. Glasgow
6. Newcastle
And here are my thoughts in the long version for the warriors ^_^' (thank youuu):
1. Manchester
++ = Great rank, international reputation, employers like it a lot?, active and attracting city, lot of students to connect with
-- = Really good at law? Renowned for economics and business no?
2. Warwick
++ = Great rank, very good reputation inside and outside uk, lot of employers told me they hire these dudes
-- = Really good at law?
3. Bristol
++ = one of the best rank in law, very interesting new llm for 2016 including courses mixing law, sociology and politics
-- = kind of unknowned outside uk? maybe a bit snob I heard?
4. Queen Mary, University of London
++ = french law firms I could talk to said they like it a lot, wide range of very interesting courses, part of the University of London, London town
influence for career, reputation and activity
-- = maybe seen as one of the worst inside london? ('competing' against UCL, LSE, and KCL :/), 'bad' rank inside and outside uk (except 3rd in the Guardian
can someone explain me this???), especially in the world rankings
5. Glasgow
++ = reknowned school of law, good ranking inside uk, not bad worldwide
-- = kind of unknowned outside uk, especially for employers?
6. Newcastle
Well, seems to clearly be the weakest here from all points of view
Thank you so much everyone for your time and consideration, have a good holidays!
Posted Aug 25, 2016 11:21
I don't think QMUL is one of the worst in London, by a long shot. Maybe it's seen as a bit behind LSE and KCL but most repuatational differences will be relatively minor.
In fact, given its footprint in France, I would think it would be one of your top choices.
I don't think QMUL is one of the worst in London, by a long shot. Maybe it's seen as a bit behind LSE and KCL but most repuatational differences will be relatively minor.
In fact, given its footprint in France, I would think it would be one of your top choices.
In fact, given its footprint in France, I would think it would be one of your top choices.
Related Law Schools
Full Profile
London, United Kingdom
941 Followers
904 Discussions
London, United Kingdom
864 Followers
960 Discussions
Full Profile
London, United Kingdom
821 Followers
948 Discussions
Manchester, United Kingdom
138 Followers
183 Discussions
Full Profile
Bristol, United Kingdom
95 Followers
161 Discussions
Coventry, United Kingdom
70 Followers
122 Discussions
Other Related Content
Living an International Life in England
Article Mar 23, 2016
Students from all over the world are drawn to England to pursue their LL.M.s while learning legal English and gaining international expertise.
Hot Discussions
-
NYU Applicants 2024-2025
46 minutes ago 54,853 235 -
Georgetown LLM 2024/2025 applicants
May 10 02:31 PM 35,538 198 -
LSE LLM 2024-25
May 07, 2024 33,605 192 -
Stanford 2024-2025
Apr 17, 2024 33,707 115 -
MCL Cambridge 2024-2025
Apr 23, 2024 12,575 111 -
Columbia LLM 2024/25
May 13 09:41 PM 25,830 105 -
UCLA LLM 2024-2025
Apr 22, 2024 12,686 88 -
UCL LLM 2024-2025
21 hours ago 6,355 60